A political party?!?
| QUOTE ( Excerpt of BBC News @ Jul 16 2006, 10:52 GMT) |
Judge HFM Hofhuis ruled that the Brotherly Love, Freedom and Diversity Party (PNVD) had the same right to exist as any other political party.
The PNVD was formed by three paedophiles in May, prompting outrage in Dutch society.
It seeks to lower the age of sexual consent from 16 to 12 and legalise child pornography and sex with animals.
<snip>
rest of article can be found at this URL:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5187010.stm |
Not sure what's worse... that they gained legitimacy in the eyes as an organization... or that people are more and more convinced that marriage and sex with animals are things Society is ready to accept.
Isn't there a lobby here that's pretty much about the same thing?
| QUOTE (Kevin Beckman @ Jul 17 2006, 05:30 PM) |
| Isn't there a lobby here that's pretty much about the same thing? |
NAMBLA. Just I dunno what their "position" on fucking animals is.
I didn't realize that wording of that until after I posted. Heh.
Well, as a proponent of free speech, I would have to agree with the Dutch judge that they have a right to exist. But I certainly agree that that's an incredibly stupid party platform.
i dont see why they would even put the effort into esatblishing a party because theyll never get anywhere, they might as well have kept on protesting for there rights becase at least then they will get media attention ( or just attention from the public) and now there a party theyll be old news and they will be ignored. so they shouldnt have even bothered doing the whole court thing cus its a waste of time ( for them)
